Archive

Archive for the ‘Economics’ Category

Why to support fuel price hike in India

March 21st, 2010 No comments

There has been a huge uproar on the fuel price rise suggested by Pranab Mukherjee, Indian FM, in the annual budget presented by him. Though many would want to bring out the daggers and shout against him, I would like to support the league of these sensible men. Knowing that Pranab was rated as one of the best five Finance Ministers of the world for the year 1984 (in days when nobody knew about India, and reforms was a word yet to be discovered), I do like to understand him before I pass any judgment on him.

To understand the rationale behind this, let us have a quick look at the macroeconomic indicators of India and government policies in last few years which are precursor to this. Indian economy is already ailing from the “populist policies” and tons of economically misaligned subsidies. The projected fiscal deficit of 2009 has been put at 10.3% of our GDP which would be among the highest in the world. The consolidated debt-GDP ratio is estimated at 76.6 per cent in 2009-10 compared to 61.0 per cent in 1995-96 and 70.6 per cent in 2000-01. This clearly points out at the widening gap in debt and GDP which would be one of the top priorities for any FM of a country. Mind it that Greece, which  was in news recently for sovereign debt crisis, has  2009 budget deficit at 12.7% of GDP. The debt to GDP ratio defines the ability of a country to service its external loans and tweak its production to have more exports if needed. Needless to say, we are in red or orange at best.

One would argue that India is not a capitalist country and hence it has to bear the burden of the social debt to subsidize the basic necessities and also spend more on social projects as no private sector would do anything in non profitable options. Infact the power, water and fuel (automobile as well as cooking) subsidies have been there on this account itself. Many would argue that the India has 42% of its population below the international poverty line, hence these subsidies are necessary; but then along with any subsidy we need to also calculate what actions need to be taken to eradicate the problem and define the deadlines to remove these subsidies. The surging economic growth in pockets has already created a differential development rates in India. The people who should ideally use these subsidies would be poor, most of whom are in villages. Ideally the subsidies should have lessened the woes of these villages but the reality is far from this. Agriculture and allied sectors like forestry, logging and fishing employed 60% of the total workforce in 2007, whereas they accounted for a meager 16.6% of the GDP (same year). The Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Committee in its latest estimates has projected that during the current financial year, agriculture sector could experience minus 2 per cent growth.

Subsidies have had more political background than economic. The Indian government subsidizes many industries and products, from gasoline to food. Loss-making state-owned enterprises are supported by the government, water is free and paid by the state and farmers are given electricity for free. Overall, a 2005 article by International Herald Tribune stated, Indian subsidies amounted to 14% of GDP! At the core of subsidies is kerosene which is supposed to be a poor person’s cooking fuel. But reports confirm that as much as 39 % of subsidized kerosene is stolen. The stolen kerosene goes to small industries, into petrol adulteration and some also use it for liquor, subsidized one!

On the other hand, India spends relatively a little on education, health, or infrastructure. Urgently needed infrastructure investment has been much lower than in China. According to the UNESCO, India has the lowest public expenditure on higher education per student in the world. No wonder that India’s vast subsidies have been severely criticised by the World Bank as increasing economic inefficiency.

And the consequences? The oil marketing companies are likely face a loss of Rs.40,000 crore in this fiscal year for selling auto and cooking fuels at a subsidized rate domestically. The huge subsidies of power has resulted in rich farmers exploiting it, people using motors to pump out the water in huge quantities, hitting the water table. The groundwater levels are plunging at alarming rates in Punjab and Haryana. The storage of water in the Indus basin reservoirs was a massive 39.12 per cent below the storage figure on the same date last year.

PSU retailers are projected to lose Rs 45,571 crore on selling petrol, diesel, domestic LPG and kerosene below cost. State-owned Indian Oil, Bharat Petroleum and Hindustan Petroleum sell fuel below cost on the orders of the government and expect a revenue loss of Rs 46,030 crore on that account this year. Of this, the government will be meeting only Rs 12,000 crore, petroleum minister Deora has explained. In case the fuel price is not increased, the above PSUs are in danger of getting bankrupt.

To avert bankruptcy, the Kirit Parikh panel has suggested freeing auto fuels from government control along with a steep hike in cooking fuel. The experts group, headed by former Planning Commission member Kirit Parikh, recommended deregulating of petrol and diesel prices, while raising kerosene and domestic LPG rates by Rs 6 per litre and Rs 100 per cylinder, respectively; which ofcourse would not happen.

Prime Minister has already said  that the impact of the rise would not be much anyway on inflation. The current inflation is not demand driven but supply driven, hence there would not be a proportionate increase in inflation. Monsoon would play a very important role to increase the supply. Still if the power is misused and spent away unwisely, the irrigation sector would not get its fair share and that will again decrease water supply; not to mention already lowered water table which would necessitate water pumps and capital for it, making it all a vicious circle.

The only way out is to remove subsidies with a defined time line and state governments, especially Punjab and Andhra Pradesh, to get some common economic sense and a sense of nationalism too instead of greed for political power.

Simply put, to remove the mess we are creating we need this price increase for now and much stronger economic policies, esp at state level, to reach the development growth we all are already thinking of having attained.

Sources of data:

  • http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Govt-talks-fuel-price-hike-with-allies/578092/
  • http://netindian.in/news/2010/02/19/0005416/pms-panel-economic-growth-exceed-72-2009-10
  • http://www.businessworld.in/index.php/Indias-Inflation-Blues.html
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidies_in_India
Categories: Economics Tags: ,

Cheap sweatshirts, only 3billion dollar a piece!

April 30th, 2009 1 comment

Insane.. just plain insane…!

Picture this, you are just strolling around in the supermarket and stumble upon a grey sweat shirt. Just a plain sweatshirt in a plain Grey color that you can find in any nook and corner of downtowns in winter. You leisurely pull the price tag and see this:

That is right, this plain sweat is worth 2.765Billion dollars!

In case you are still with me, and have not fainted, let me explain the horror. It is the Zimbabwean dollar being talked about, the nation that has seen the largest ever hyper inflation ever where the worth of a currency note is less the cost of making such a note. In February last year, the annual inflation rose to more than 100,000 percent and the local currency tumbled to a record low of 25 million Zimbabwe dollars to one US dollar.

Reason for hyperinflation
If you ask me, its mediocrity itself on part of government thinking. The Central Bank prints too much money to pay for government expenditures. When the government notices prices are rising, it responds by issuing even more money. And this goes on till the money revolving in economy is so much that one ends up paying 3 billion for a sweat shirt!

Problem is not just with prices, its also with the amount of notes you need to buy things. So bank needs to print the currency of higher denomination and that is how Zimbabwe has come out with currency notes of 1 million, 10 million, 500 million, 1 billion and so on. You would expect some monetary and fiscal reforms to correct this, but instead the policy that Zimbabwe government came out with was that in August 2008 the Central Bank of Zimbabwe introduced a new currency slashing all zeroes. But as the right demon was not encountered, two months later they were back at 10,000 notes and it won’t be long before the old notes may be re-used. It was reported that annual inflation reached 231 million percent in July last year.

So how does it look like now?
Bad.. real bad! See this, you can not carry a plastic card for transaction to most of the places, so you need cash, and hell lot of cash!! Just wads and wads of cash! See the images below:

The million dollar baby

The billion dollar baby - who says money does not bring happiness? See this! You would end up laughing!!

What? No body is looting this kid?

Do not mis jusge this guy, he is just going to supermarket to buy vegetables

Time to pay the bill, open the almirah!

The new currency notes - these have last 10 zeros removed and stones signfy the heaviness

The new currency notes - these have last 10 zeros removed and stones signfy the heaviness

But who will tell them that the inflation has not stopped. So here we are, this is what we get to buy from new notes

But who will tell them that the inflation has not stopped. So here we are, this is what we get to buy from new notes

Back to square one - bank had to start issuing 500K notes again and before its too late, we will again have the one billion dollar note coming back to life

Back to square one - bank had to start issuing 50K notes again and before its too late, we will again have the one billion dollar note coming back to life

Why? Why ? Why the hell Mr. Mugambe ?!!!

Categories: Economics Tags: ,

Four Weeks of Financial Turmoil

October 8th, 2008 1 comment
Last four weeks have sent the financial world in a full carnage, as bear guzzled up the giants who had been on bull rampage for quite some time now.

We are sure you would have read about what happened, how it happened and what can happen further, so here are some links to just epitomize the blood bath.
(All of these are either interactive or images)

Journey of the four weeks of dominoes turmoil

Price-Earning ratios graph, indicating when its time for stock to bond market shift

How the Credit Crisis Unfolded

A timeline of bailouts and buyouts of financial companies in US and UK

Sources: NY Times website

Categories: Economics, Finance Tags:

Economics of a non-cash transaction

October 1st, 2008 1 comment
You would have seen these notices outside shops

All Major credit cards accepted, Conditions apply
Condition: Bill should be atleast Rs.200

No return, No Exchange
2% extra on credit cards


This makes us wonder about the business model of a credit card and how the economies of a credit card transaction are placed between various entities involved in a transaction.

Ideally in a transaction, you would see two parties – an entity who pays and an entity who accepts; but to complete a credit card transaction you will need five entities to come and work in unison. (It may happen that some of these entities are same and not different)

Lets go through the last transaction you did when you bought that book for yourself. Say the book was of Rs. 100 and you paid through your ICICI Visa card and signed on the slip, showing HDFC name, which was kept by the merchant. Now as per the illustration below, Merchant would get back only Rs. 98.10 from Acquirer out of 100 and is paid 1.9% less. This 1.9% will now feed the rest of the three entities. And you will pay back full Rs. 100 to your credit card issuer, ICICI bank, at end of your billing period. But ICICI will give Acquirer (HDFC here), the one who placed the card reader in the shop, Rs 98.60 keeping Rs 1.40 to itself. So by now HDFC has already made Rs 0.50 (98.6-98.1). Now HDFC will give Rs. 0.07 to VISA while ICICI will give Rs. 0.08 to VISA.

Now above numbers are for transaction of Rs. 100 so use these numbers in percentage points and you get an idea of money interchanged per transaction in percentage. The numbers here are just illustrative and would change according to network, merchant type etc. But they do give a fair idea.

But then there are many ways of doing a non cash transaction these days: Credit card, Debit Card, Prepaid Card, PayPal/Google Checkout or Mobile payments…

The snapshot below lists the approximate processing fees charged by each major player in various payment instruments (ranging from Cash/Check to Credt & Debit Cards and Mobile Payments).

Categories: Economics, Finance Tags:

Income distribution since 1970

June 6th, 2008 2 comments
The distribution of income is central to one of the most enduring issues in political economics. On one extreme you will find the communists who argue that all incomes should be the same, or as nearly so as possible, and that a principal function of government should be to redistribute income from the haves to the have-nots. On the other extreme are those who argue that any income redistribution by government is bad. They argue that income redistribution makes people lazy and gives them incentive not to work, it favors the free riders and punishes the hard workers.

I was just checking the income distribution change in India with respect to the other nations. The rise of Indian middle class is so so evident here, and at the same time one can see how China’s middle class gave in to a better distribution of money. Number of higher income people are much higher in China and Brazil than India, their BRIC partner. You can check these graphs from the website http://www.gapminder.org


Income Mobility
Another factor to consider when studying the degree of inequality in a society is the amount of income mobility. Income mobility refers to the ease with which workers can move up and down in the hierarchy of earning power. If the rich always stay rich and the poor always stay poor, then an unequal income distribution is a permanent and serious problem. But if they can move then it is much better for national economy.
Categories: Economics Tags:

Where 1kg chicken costs 15m$

June 1st, 2008 No comments
Indian inflation figure was reeling between 3 and 4% when it all started, then it touched 5 and people started getting scared. It touched 6 and FM started getting scared, it touched 7 and PM started getting scared, and CPI was dancing over all these guys head plus Sonia crying foul. But these figures are kids if you have read anything about inflation in Zimbabwe. Take a wild guess, what can be the inflation rate over there if I tell you that it is much much more than layman may guess? Well ans is, its more than… hold your breath… 355000 percent! Can you believe it?!! Its highest in world and I guess a world record too!

Top government sources said the inflation figures for March had initially been projected at 406 000%, but were still being computed as the Central Statistical Office (CSO) continues to fiddle with the consumer basket. However, the CSO projection, sources said, has placed inflation for May at over 1 200 000% if the trend continues. The central bank introduced the $500 million bearer cheques for the public and the $5 billion, $25 billion, $50 billion agro-cheques for farmers. The new notes come hardly two weeks after the introduction of the $250 million bearer cheques. The Zimbabwe 10 million dollar note pictured below, is currently worth about only $4 (USD) on the black market.

Zimbabwe’s economy spiraled downward from Second Congo War, leading to food and oil shortages, hyperinflation, and massive emigration. During this recent period Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe’s policies have been denounced in the West and at home as racist against Zimbabwe’s white minority.

Until 2000, Zimbabwe was the ‘breadbasket of Africa’, exporting wheat, tobacco, and corn to the rest of the continent and beyond. Zimbabwe contains the most fertile farmland on the continent, and until recently was a tourist Mecca, home of Victoria Falls, one the seven natural wonders of the world, and numerous game reserves, now nearly emptied by poachers and starving peasants. It’s hard to comprehend exactly what living within such a catastrophic economic crisis actually means. Imagine going to the pub buying a drink and then two hours later returning to the bar to order the same drink again but only to learn that the prices have now doubled – would you pay?

Categories: Economics Tags:

Catty Games

June 1st, 2008 1 comment
Quantum Theory is one of the most bizzare yet fascinating theories. You can read volumes about it and yet still be in the dark about it. It is truly weird and amazing and applicability to practical life seems unfathomable.

On the other hand Game Theory which was once an economic theory has now been expanded and is being used in all aspects of our lives. From bidding in auctions to deciding geo-political balances of power.
Q) So what do we get when we add these 2 ingredients in a recipe for Science ?
Ans.) The death of Game Theory ( in practice at least).

Let me propound this grave statement by talking about a cat. Schroedinger’s Cat.
Let us find a small kitten and put him in a box. And put the lid on. Add in the box a tiny capsule of cyanide gas, which breaks when the cat steps on it and kills the cat. Now close the lid of the box.

After the lid has been shut we have no way of knowing whether the cat is alive or dead as we can’t see the cat. So quantum theory states that the cat is both alive and dead in a weird superposition of states. The moment we close the box , the cat moves into 2 parallel states of universe ; One in which it is dead and one in which it is alive. Opening the box superposes the 2 universes back together and the cat appears as dead or alive.

Now what is the implication for game theory. Game theory tries to pre-empt the actions of opposing parties by finding out what will logically due to happen. But in games where one does not know for sure what the opposing action will be and there is a play of probability ( eg Say Company A , decides to launch a product. Now Company B , may or may not decide to play a price war on it. Company A can never know this and must assume probabilities) .

We see that whenever there is a probability component because we cannot see the state of a system ( as in the cat) there are multiple possibilities and they all exist at the same time. Hence game theory cannot predict the action as all actions are equally likely and hence there can be no best strategy for player A, based on decisions for player B.

BUT, this is not seen to be true, Why ? Because the theory implies that the state of the system is not visible to the observer. But in Reality, in all cases the observer has an idea of the system state at all times and hence Quantum States is not true and Game Theory still is Alive and Kicking !!!
Categories: Economics Tags:

When rich gets hungrier, poor sleeps without food?

May 31st, 2008 No comments
When the inflation is on a rise world over, the largest economy in the world is looking the face of recession and the food prices are rising on global level its all natural for a specialists like Amartya Kumar Sen to put forward their arguments on all this. And as judgmental creatures we are, we end up criticizing present rather than propose a future in form of a action.

For introduction, Amartya Kumar Sen is an Indian economist, philosopher, and a winner of the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences (Nobel Prize for Economics) in 1998, “for his contributions to welfare economics” for his work on famine, human development theory, welfare economics, the underlying mechanisms of poverty, and political liberalism.

In his blog post he has explained the food mismatch citing example of a country with a lot of poor people who suddenly experience fast economic expansion, but only half of the people share in the new prosperity. The favored ones spend a lot of their new income on food, and unless supply expands very quickly, prices shoot up. The rest of the poor now face higher food prices but no greater income, and begin to starve.

He also takes a dig on the use of ethanol as fuel. Produced mainly from corn in US, it routes the food production for different consumption, and its the poor who has to pay for it. Logic is simple, countries like India, China, Vietnam and Argentina are experiencing rapid development; people move up to better and processed food; the food consumption per person rises and the food export which was coming from these nations earlier lessens or stops. The inflation rises and food prices shoot up, the poor who already were surviving on cheap and small food quantity are forced to hunger. The world’s poor are themselves divided between those who are experiencing high growth and those who are not; and the number of the latter is quite high.

This reminds me of a small game every new batch in FMS, Delhi (India) was made to play in Induction session by the faculty of organizational behavior. Crux of the game was that you may register a high growth or spikes of it in short run on your own. But to maintain growing in the long run, you need the co operation from all others. Same holds true for global economy and with more and more countries on development phase, it is going to hold more and more true for the world economy.

Categories: Economics Tags:

Putinomics rocks!

May 12th, 2008 2 comments
Putin has stepped down as president and stepped up as prime minister now. The Russian economy has gone through a lot of changes and the baton has been passed now. The steel man Vladimir Putin’s administration appears to have left Russia’s economy in a rosy state. Economic growth averaged 7.2% between 1999 and 2008. Foreign reserves stand at 30% of GDP and are the third highest in the world in absolute terms. The stock market has increased twenty-fold. The middle class is buying foreign cars, vacationing abroad, and dining at sushi restaurants, and surveys show that life satisfaction has increased across the board.

As project syndicate reports, Russia’s economic success is partly attributable to high oil and commodities prices. But oil is not the whole story. The tax reform of 2001 improved incentives to work and decreased tax evasion by introducing a flat 13% income tax – one of the world’s lowest. Liberalizing the procedures for corporate registration and licensing, and limiting inspections, improved the climate for small businesses and entrepreneurs. Conservative macroeconomic policy and financial-sector reform lowered interest rates and fueled an investment and consumption boom. Real wages tripled, and poverty and unemployment fell by half.
Source: Wikipedia

Inequality and corruption are going to be the main obstacles now. Despite Russia’s recent economic achievements, both remain at alarmingly high levels. According to Forbes magazine, there were 87 Russian billionaires, with combined wealth of $471 billion, a figure second only to the United States. Yet their net worth accounts for roughly 30% of Russia’s GDP, whereas America’s 469 billionaires are worth only about 10% of US GDP.

More importantly, inequality of opportunity is very high as well. According to a recent survey, a majority of Russians believes that acquiring wealth requires criminal activity and political connections. Only 20% believe that talent matters. These beliefs are self-fulfilling prophecies.

Categories: Economics Tags:

The economics of a bubble burst

April 7th, 2008 3 comments
Once there was a little island country. The land of this country was the tiny island itself. The total money in circulation was 2 dollar as there were only two pieces of 1 dollar coins circulating around.

1) There were 3 citizens living on this island country. A owned the land. B and C each owned 1 dollar.

2) B decided to purchase the land from A for 1 dollar. So, A and C now each own 1 dollar while B owned a piece of land that is worth 1 dollar.
The net asset of the country = 3 dollar.

3) C thought that since there is only one piece of land in the country and land is non productive asset, its value must definitely go up. So, he borrowed 1 dollar from A and together with his own 1 dollar, he bought the land from B for 2 dollar.
A has a loan to C of 1 dollar, so his net asset is 1 dollar.
B sold his land and got 2 dollar, so his net asset is 2 dollar.
C owned the piece of land worth 2 dollar but with his 1 dollar debt to A, his net asset is 1 dollar.

The net asset of the country = 4 dollar.

4) A saw that the land he once owned has risen in value. He regretted selling it. Luckily, he has a 1 dollar loan to C. He then borrowed 2 dollar from B and and acquired the land back from C for 3 dollar. The payment is by 2 dollar cash (which he borrowed) and cancellation of the 1 dollar loan to C.
As a result, A now owned a piece of land that is worth 3 dollar. But since he owed B 2 dollar, his net asset is 1 dollar.

B loaned 2 dollar to A. So his net asset is 2 dollar.
C now has the 2 coins. His net asset is also 2 dollar.
The net asset of the country = 5 dollar. A bubble is building up.

(5) B saw that the value of land kept rising. He also wanted to own the land. So he bought the land from A for 4 dollar. The payment is by borrowing 2 dollar from C and cancellation of his 2 dollar loan to A.

As a result, A has got his debt cleared and he got the 2 coins. His net asset is 2 dollar.
B owned a piece of land that is worth 4 dollar but since he has a debt of 2 dollar with C, his net Asset is 2 dollar.
C loaned 2 dollar to B, so his net asset is 2 dollar.

The net asset of the country = 6 dollar. Even though, the country has only one piece of land and 2 Dollar in circulation.

(6) Everybody has made money and everybody felt happy and prosperous.

(7) One day an evil thought came to C’s mind. “Hey, what if the land price stop going up, how could B repay my loan. There is only 2 dollar in circulation, I think after all the land that B owns is worth at most 1 dollar only.”
A also thought the same by now.

(8) Nobody wanted to buy land anymore. In the end, A owns the 2 dollar coins, his net asset is 2 dollar. B owed C 2 dollar and the land he owned which he thought worth 4 dollar is now 1 dollar. His net asset become -1 dollar.

C has a loan of 2 dollar to B. But it is a bad debt. Although his net asset is still 2 dollar, his Heart is palpitating.

The net asset of the country = 3 dollar again.

Of course, before the bubble burst B thought his land worth 4 dollar. His net asset is still 2 dollar, his heart is palpitating.

The net asset of the country = 3 dollar again.

(9) B had no choice but to declare bankruptcy. C as to relinquish his 2 dollar bad debt to B but in return he acquired the land which is worth 1 dollar now.

A owns the 2 coins, his net asset is 2 dollar. B is bankrupt, his net asset is 0 dollar. ( B lost everything ) C got no choice but end up with a land worth only 1 dollar (C lost one dollar) The net asset of the country = 3 dollar.

******* Story Ends *******

There is however a redistribution of wealth. A is the winner, B is the loser, C is lucky that he is spared.

A few points worth noting -

(1) When a bubble is building up, the debt of individual in a country to one another is also building up.
(2) This story of the island is a close system whereby there is no other country and hence no foreign debt. The worth of the asset can
only be calculated using the island’s own currency. Hence, there is no net loss.
(3) An overdamped system is assumed when the bubble burst, meaning the land’s value did not go down to below 1 dollar.
(4) When the bubble burst, the fellow with cash is the winner. The fellows having the land or extending loan to others are the loser. The asset could shrink or in worst case, they go bankrupt.
(5) If there is another citizen D either holding a dollar or another piece of land but refrain to take part in the game. At the end of the day, he will neither win nor lose. But he will see the value of his money or land go up and down like a see saw.
(6) When the bubble was in the growing phase, everybody made money.
(7) If you are smart and know that you are living in a growing bubble, it is worthwhile to borrow money (like A ) and take part in the game. But you must know when you should change everything back to cash.
(8) In addition of land, the above applies to stocks as well.
(9) The actual worth of land or stocks depend largely on psychology.

Source: Anonymous mail forwards

Categories: Economics Tags: